Please Send Me Stuff

If you have articles, information, thoughts you want to share just send it to me at ali.syedakbar@gmail.com. Please keep your articles brief, not more than 1000 words or just use bullet points. If you have pictures to go with the articles, that is even better. Towards an excellent Malaysia.

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Kepala H*t*k Engkau !!

 
 
Inisiatif GTP kawal pembiayaan politik

PUTRAJAYA 27 Feb 2012. - Kerajaan hari ini mengumumkan satu lagi inisiatif di bawah Pelan Transformasi Kerajaan (GTP) bertujuan mengawal pembiayaan politik demi meningkatkan ketelusan dan keyakinan rakyat terhadap pertubuhan politik.

My comments : kepala h*t*k engkau

Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak berkata, inisiatif itu menekankan bahawa setiap sumbangan kepada mana-mana parti politik sama ada di peringkat pusat mahu pun negeri hendaklah disalurkan melalui akaun rasmi parti. 

My comments : "  "  "

Langkah itu, katanya, bagi mengelakkan ahli-ahli politik menyalahgunakan nama parti untuk meminta atau menerima apa-apa sumbangan yang kemudiannya diselewengkan untuk kepentingan persendirian. 
 
My comments : "  "  "

''Bagi pihak kerajaan isu dana politik amat penting kerana jika tiada suatu dasar yang tepat, telus dan jelas mengenainya, maka ia boleh membuka ruang dan peluang kepada perlakuan rasuah,'' katanya. 

My comments : "  "  "

Beliau berkata demikian ketika berucap merasmikan Program Pegawai Integriti Bertauliah 2012 di sini hari ini. 

Turut hadir Ketua Setiausaha Negara, Tan Sri Mohd. Sidek Hassan dan Ketua Pesuruhjaya SPRM, Datuk Seri Abu Kassim Mohamad.

Menurut Perdana Menteri, setiap sumbangan perlulah dikemukakan resit penerimaan dan dimasukkan ke dalam akaun parti.

My comments : "  "  "

Katanya, menerusi rekod penerimaan yang teratur ia boleh diaudit pada tiap-tiap akhir tahun kewangan

My comments : "  "  "

''Kerajaan percaya inisiatif seumpama ini akan mengelakkan sebarang bentuk perbuatan rasuah dan penyelewengan di peringkat akar umbi dan manfaat kepada sumbangan dapat disampaikan kepada segenap peringkat parti dan seterusnya rakyat," katanya.

My comments : "  "  "

Najib berkata, pandangan dan saranan Lembaga Penasihat SPRM sebelum ini berhubung dana politik sememangnya diberi perhatian sehingga membawa kepada pelaksanaan inisiatif mengawal pembiayaan politik. 

My comments : "  "  "

Sementara itu, Najib memberitahu, kerajaan juga bercadang untuk memaparkan setiap draf rang undang-undang di laman web kementerian berkaitan bagi mendapat pandangan umum.

My comments : "  "  "

''Ia akan menangkis persepsi umum dan antarabangsa bahawa kononnya terdapat undang-undang yang hanya mengambil kira kepentingan sesetengah pihak sahaja," katanya.

My comments : "  "  "

 
© Utusan Melayu (M) Bhd

"..polis tak akan buat kerja gila begini.."

Here is a famous quote by an Englishman :
 
Oh what a tangled web we weave,  
When first we practise to deceive!
 
by Sir Walter Scott

Indeed when you start telling one lie, you must tell another lie to cover the first lie. Then it is just downhill. Quite soon you become an all out  liar.
 
Which idiot wants to believe that one rich camel shagger would donate RM2.6 billion to anyone? 
 
Here is a precise saying about this mystery donor by a doctor friend of mine whose mind is totally unfettered. 
 
"I suspekkk kalu Satu Malaysia ni sehati sejiwa collectively juai pungk*k kat pak arab pun mampuiiih tak cecah donation sampai 2.6 billion... "

She has a way with words but I agree.  
 
Ok here is a news item citing that SPRM director who was interrogated by the Special Branch. You can read it here.
    
Ini perkara gila, kata pengarah SPRM lepas disiasat polis 
 
 
Pengarah Bahagian Operasi Khas (SPRM) Datuk Bahri Mohamad Zin berkata beliau juga terkejut apabila timbalan pendakwa raya (SPRM) mereka ditangkap polis di malam hari.  
 
Pengarah (SPRM) disiasat Cawangan Khas lebih 3 jam ..melahirkan rasa terkejut dan kesal terhadap siasatan polis ke atas siasatan mereka terhadap operasi dana sarat hutang (1MDB).

"Saya cukup kesal perkara ini berlaku kerana kami menyiasat dengan sepenuh hati siang dan malam bagi mencari kebenaran.

"Tiba-tiba DPP kami diambil pada pukul 1 pagi dan ia amat menghairankan kenapa boleh berlaku perkara gila sedemikian," katanya 
 
Bahri adalah sebahagian daripada pasukan khas yang menyiasat 1MDB.

Beliau turut melahirkan rasa curiga dengan individu lain yang dipercayai berada di belakang siri serbuan polis ke atas mereka yang menyiasat 1MDB.

"Saya rasa pihak polis tak akan buat kerja gila begini kecuali ada pihak lain memaksa pihak polis melakukannya," katanya.

polis menahan pegawai Jabatan Peguam Negara Jessica Kaur dan Tan Sri Rashpal
 
Mereka dibebaskan apabila pihak polis gagal mendapatkan perintah reman

SPRM menafikan kebocoran .. dalam agensi anti-rasuah itu.

SPRM berkata Rashpal tidak mempunyai akses kepada siasatan kerana tempoh perkhidmatan beliau sebagai ahli lembaga itu berakhir pada Februari. – 3 Ogos, 2015.

- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/pengarah-sprm-terkejut-kesal-siasatan-mengejut-polis-terhadap-1mdb#sthash.TjI470nw.ysvyeUbE.dpuf


Malam ini saya pinjam comment sahaja :    ""I suspekkk kalu Satu Malaysia ni sehati sejiwa collectively juai pungk*k kat pak arab pun mampuiiih tak cecah donation sampai 2.6 billion... ""

Good night

Monday, August 3, 2015

Hooray ! MACC Confirms RM2.6 Billion In Personal Accounts

My comment :  So does this mean that Wall Street Journal and Sarawak Report did not have any 'berbaur-baur fitnah' about this "RM2.6 Billion in personal accounts" issue? 

Anyone going to apologise to them?  No? They are just white skinned people? Oh ok.

Ahmad Maslan who is so damned stupid said no one would be so stupid to put RM2.6 Billion in their personal accounts. Well Mat Maslan I agree with you here 100%. Only a moron would put RM2.6 Billion in his personal account.  Your point is proven. So now there are two of you.

Anyway here is the news :

MACC: RM2.6b in Najib’s account from ‘donors’, not 1MDB

Monday August 3, 2015

RM2.6 billion deposited into Najib Razak’s accounts come from ‘donors’ and not 1MDB, MACC said in a statement August 3, 2015. 

— Malaysia’s graftbusters confirmed today that RM2.6 billion had been deposited into Najib Razak’s accounts but said the funds came from “donors” and not (1MDB) as previously alleged.

(MACC) did not, however, disclose the identities of these donors or the purpose of the contribution, as well as how the money was spent.

“The report resulting from the investigation involving the RM2.6 billion has been referred and informed to the Attorney-General.
The special task force leading a separate probe on 1MDB said last month that two bank accounts held by Najib in AmBank were already closed long before an investigation was launched against the misappropriation.

My comments : 

And what happened to the money now?  The accounts were closed. So where did the money go AFTER the accounts were closed? 

They did not spend ALL the RM2.6 Billion on the elections. There was a huge sum left over. Where is the left over money?

Who can answer? Who should answer? Najib should answer. They are his own personal accounts.

Earlier Najib said (in Parliament I think) that 1MDB could not bring back money to Malaysia because Bank Negara had too much red tape. Something about any amount more than RM50 Million must get clearance etc. Thats why 1MDB (or its subsidiary) put the money in Singapore.

Then later we found out that the money was NOT even there. They became 'units'.  Some documents were also forged. Have you all forgotten that story? Documents were forged. Bottom line there WAS no money in that bank in Singapore.

Ok back to this shocking news - so how did Najib move RM2.6 Billion into his personal account here in Kuala Lumpur? 

Did he go through Bank Negara's red tape?  

If he did then Zeti must have known about this. Can Zeti answer? 

Did Najib fill in the forms at Bank Negara or not (becaue it was his personal account) - to explain the fact that RM2.6 Billion was being deposited into his accounts from donors etc? 

I assume the deposits were coming from overseas because there is absolutely NO WAY any local Malaysian can give Najib that much money as a donation. 

So if Najib filled up all the requisite Bank Negara red tape forms to move RM2.6 Billion into his account in KL, then why the hell did Najib say that those other billions were taken to Singapore because THEY WANTED TO AVOID all the Bank Negara red tape?

(When you tell the first lie, then you must tell a thousand more lies to cover up the first one. This is what is happening folks.)

On the other hand, if there was little or NO red tape to move the RM2.6 Billion into his personal account here in KL, then why the hell did Najib say that there was red tape to move those other billions that finally ended up as "units"  in BSI Singapore ??  

So here is the soalan cepu mas.  Where is that money that WAS NOT even deposited in BSI Singapore? You say they are now "units"?  The "units" were paid with our money. Paid to whom? Who did you pay the money to, to get those units? 

Finally, coming back to these two accounts in KL : since the accounts were closed already, where did the money go? 

Did you open another account? You must have opened another account because most certainly you cannot keep cash of RM1 Billion or a few hundred million Ringgit in your house.

So after you closed those accounts - where did you move the remaining money that was left in the account? 

And how much money was left over when the accounts were closed? Can you please answer.

Mr PM, have you bought any expensive houses (in your name, in the names of legal proxies, using legal shelf companies etc) anywhere in the world since 2009? 

Expensive means say more than RM25 Million. Say in London or Los Angeles etc.  A simple yes or no answer will do. 

If no, then let the matter rest. 

If yes, then please give some details. How much, where, how you paid for them etc.

You are the Prime Minister and president of UMNO, the head party in the ruling BN coalition. 

The people (that includes me) have a right to ask such questions and you are obliged to answer these questions, honestly and hopefully promptly as well.  

Mengulas Kenayataan Media IGP


I posted this earlier but did not have time to comment on it.  So here goes again :




I note the comment where the IGP said he will NOT investigate the video where the ex DPM clearly says that the PM himself told him that RM2.6 Billion was in his (the PM's) personal account. The IGP said that it is up to the Special Task Force to investigate. 

Unless this is a Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde situation, isnt the IGP part of the Task Force too?  

Ok, lets stop shaking our heads and move on. Since the IGP cannot investigate, is the Task Force going to investigate Muhyiddin's statement in that video or not?

The next question is : is the arrest of Rashpal, Jessica and Ahmad Sazilee at the behest of the Task Force or not? Please answer yes or no? 


If it is at the behest of the Task Force then why is the IGP issuing the Media Statement? 

Shouldnt it be the Task Force that issues the Media Statement?

And why is it that since Gani Patail was sacked from office the Task Force does not issue anymore media statements ?

If the Task Force did not order or suggest the investigation and arrest of Rashpal, Jessica and Sazili did the IGP arrest them on his own (ie the Police lah)?

If it is the IGP who investigated and arrested the three people, then how come the IGP says the Police cannot investigate that video of Muhyiddin Yassin?  It does not add up.

A

In the Kenyataan Media, the IGP says 'laporan berbaur fitnah'.  Has this been established in any Court of law?

The PM who is the head of the gomen, threatened to sue the Sarawak Report for libel etc. He also threatened to sue the Wall Street Journal for libel etc. 

A legal suit in a Court would have been very useful to establish 'laporan berbaur fitnah.'   

However todate the PM or any other relevant entity have NOT even sent a proper Letter of Demand to Sarawak Report.  

So Tan Sri IGP, the 'berbaur fitnah'  has not only been not fully proven but it has not even been fully denied by the PM. 

Here is one example : the PM has not denied that the bank account linked to his name IS his account. Dia buat diam saja.   

So where is the 'berbaur fitnah' vis a vis that personal bank account?  What is really going on?

Now the latest news is that the MACC says the RM2.6 Billion is from a PENDERMA pula. Wow? A very rich penderma who gave RM2.6 Billion?

This changes the equation lagi. In light of this latest news, the question is - are these accusations (especially the report by WSJ) still considered fitnah? Or do they have basis now? 

This is where the investigation by an independent and unfettered team will help to throw light on the situation. 

Tapi Gani Patail sudah kena pecat. 

Timbalan Perdana Menteri yang  menyoal sikit saja pun sudah kena buang.

The Head of the Special Branch has also been changed. (Maybe a more significant event).

Sekarang Zeti pula under pressure, tapi tak tahu details exactly. Banyak cerita.

MACC Chief Abu Kassim pi cuti pula. Also his Deputy Shukri who seems more tegas over this issue. 

And the PAC?  Well the PAC has become like the OIC. 

Lets look at the Kenyataan Media above in detail.

"EKORAN BEBERAPA LAPORAN POLIS YANG TELAH DIBUAT TERHADAP PENGARANG ETC ETC ...SERAMAI TIGA INDIVIDU TELAH DITAHAN..."

So its not 'berhubung dengan' (in connection with).  It is an 'EKORAN'. Ekoran usually means 'after'.  

After police reports were made about Clare Rewcastle, three individuals were arrested.

Tan Sri IGP, it is unusual for an IGP to make a Kenyataan Media about individuals who have been arrested by the Police. It certainly embarrasses those individuals to have the Inspector General of Police announce to the whole world that they were arrested. 

Now to be fair you must also clarify why two of these arrests were thrown out by the Court? You could not even get a remand order from the Court.

Was the third guy (Sazili?) even charged in Court?

The Court released Rashpal and Jessica. No remand order was awarded by the Court. (This is what I read in Malaysian Insider). This means there is no case. The court cannot see any 'berbaur fitnah'. 
 
There is some serious egg on the face of the Police here.

And what is the meaning of "..pihak polis telah merakam percakapan ketiga-tiga mereka berhubung laporan berbaur fitnah dibuat oleh Clare ..."??

Is this a legally correct statement? 

The police interview witnesses and suspects and record their statements in relation to a case where the witnesses or suspects are directly involved (first person).

"..merakam percakapan ketiga-tiga mereka berhubung laporan berbaur fitnah dibuat oleh Clare Rewcastle Brown"  sounds like you picked up three people from the street, who you think may have watched Mission Impossible 6 and then you "merakam percakapan ketiga-tiga merekaon what they think about Mission Impossible 6.  Thats it.

They are not the actors, they are not the producers, or publishers or the distributors.

Very wishy washy. I think that is why the Court threw out your remand request.

I have always had the highest regard for the Police Force. 

The Malayan Emergency is of special interest to me. I have enough research and material to write a book about the crowning achievement of the Royal Malaysian Police during the Emergency Years (1948 - 1960).   The Police Force saved this country from being destroyed by violent communist aggression.  

It was a stirling performance by a disciplined and thoroughly professional Police Force.  I think Policemen were also less tembam then.


The Police force is in a very tight situation now. They are in the spotlight and I think for the wrong reasons.

I really hope that there are still men and women of integrity within the Police force who have those stirling qualities of professionalism, discipline and commitment. 

When the country was in grave danger, the Police have always stepped forward to serve the nation.  

That time is now upon us again. There must be good men and women in the Force.

Please Take The Poll


Predictably the PM still is not able to give a simple yes or no answer if that infamous bank account belongs to him. 

Some smart guy has pointed out that the account has been closed.

So how can anyone say that the money in the account was used for the general elections? If the account has been closed, where is the money now?

Takkan simpan dalam bantal? Atau tilam katil?

I am running a poll again - "Do you support Najib". To get the point across this is a simpe Yes or  NO choice.  Please take the poll. 

You can see the trend of these polls in the first few hours. It is holding steady at over 90% NOT in support of Najib.

This Blog has over 20 million pageviews. Thank you everyone. Not a kuchi blog exactly. Thank you for your votes. 

Please do take the poll and speak your mind. This is still a free country. We must keep it that way. Cheers.